The openai-completions provider now calls .withResponse() on the
create() result to surface HTTP status/headers for the new onResponse
hook (d131fcd4). The FakeOpenAI test mock only returned an async
iterable, so 4 tests in openai-completions-tool-choice.test.ts that
actually consume the stream failed with "withResponse is not a function".
Updated the mock to return a Promise augmented with .withResponse()
resolving to { data: <async iterable>, response: { status, headers } }.
closes#3304
Exposes the new ThinkingConfig.display field on Anthropic and Bedrock
Claude providers. Defaults to 'summarized' so Claude Opus 4.7 and Mythos
Preview keep returning thinking text despite Anthropic's silent default
change to 'omitted'. Set to 'omitted' explicitly to skip thinking
streaming for faster time-to-first-text-token.
Mutate persisted tool-call blocks in place on function_call completion,
remove partialJson, and emit the same reference on toolcall_end.
Add regression coverage for persisted block cleanup and event identity.
fixes#3078
The OpenRouterRouting interface only had only and order, but the runtime
passes the entire object as-is to the OpenRouter API's provider field.
This means all other fields worked at runtime but had no TypeScript
type-checking, no autocomplete, and no config validation.
This adds all fields from the OpenRouter provider selection API
(https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/routing/provider-selection):
allow_fallbacks, require_parameters, data_collection, zdr,
enforce_distillable_text, ignore, quantizations, sort, max_price,
preferred_min_throughput, preferred_max_latency.
Also fixes the models.md documentation which had an invalid fallbacks
field in the example (not part of the OpenRouter API), replaces it with
a comprehensive example showing all available fields, and clarifies that
openRouterRouting is sent as-is in the provider field.
The 2.5-flash-lite model was incorrectly matching the 2.5-flash
case, setting minimal budget to 128. Per Google's docs, flash-lite's
minimum thinking budget is 512, not 128. This caused the error:
The thinking budget 128 is invalid. Please choose a value between
512 and 24576.
Add a dedicated 2.5-flash-lite case before the 2.5-flash case so
the more specific match takes priority.
Fixes#2838
Co-authored-by: JasonOA888 <JasonOA888@users.noreply.github.com>
Mario Zechner