update

src/interface.jl

@@ -91,10 +91,17 @@ function decisionMaker(a::T1, state::T2)::Dict{Symbol, Any} where {T1<:agent, T2
   $(JSON3.write(state[:storeinfo]))
   """
 
+  lessonDict = copy(JSON3.read("lesson.json"))
+
   lesson =
-  if isempty(a.lesson)
+  if isempty(lessonDict)
     ""
   else
+    lessons = Dict{Symbol, Any}()
+    for (k, v) in lessonDict
+      lessons[k] = lessonDict[k][:lesson]
+    end
+
     """
     You have attempted to help the user before and failed, either because your reasoning for the 
     recommendation was incorrect or your response did not exactly match the user expectation. 
@@ -102,7 +109,7 @@ function decisionMaker(a::T1, state::T2)::Dict{Symbol, Any} where {T1<:agent, T2
     did previously. Use them to improve your strategy to help the user.
 
     Here are some lessons:
-    $(JSON3.write(a.lesson[:lesson_1][:lesson]))
+    $(JSON3.write(lessons))
 
     When providing the thought and action for the current trial, that into account these failed 
     trajectories and make sure not to repeat the same mistakes and incorrect answers. 
@@ -211,8 +218,14 @@ function decisionMaker(a::T1, state::T2)::Dict{Symbol, Any} where {T1<:agent, T2
 
         # check if dict has all required value
         dummya::AbstractString = thoughtDict[:thought]
-        dummyb::AbstractString = thoughtDict[:action][:name]
-        dummyc::AbstractString = thoughtDict[:action][:input]
+        actionname::AbstractString = thoughtDict[:action][:name]
+        actioninput::AbstractString = thoughtDict[:action][:input]
+
+        if actionname ∈ ["winestock", "chatbox", "recommendbox"]
+          # LLM use available function
+        else
+          error("DecisionMaker use wrong function")
+        end
 
         return thoughtDict
       catch e