update

src/interface.jl

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 module interface
     
-export addNewMessage, conversation, decisionMaker, progressValueEstimator, reflector
+export addNewMessage, conversation, decisionMaker, evaluator, reflector
       # isterminal,
 
 using JSON3, DataStructures, Dates, UUIDs, HTTP, Random, MQTTClient, PrettyPrinting
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ julia>
 
 # Signature
 """
-function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where {T1<:agent, T2<:AbstractDict}
+function evaluator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where {T1<:agent, T2<:AbstractDict}
   
   _prompt = 
   """
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where
   analysis in detail. Focus on the latest thought, action, and observation. Incomplete trajectories 
   can be correct if the thoughts and actions so far are correct, even if the answer is not found 
   yet. Do not generate additional thoughts or actions. Then ending with the correctness score s 
-  where s is an integer from 1 to 10.
+  where s is an integer from 0 to 10.
 
   You should only respond in JSON format as describe below:
   {"evaluation": "your evaluation", "score": "your evaluation score"}
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where
   }
   {"evaluation": "This trajectory is correct as it is reasonable to check an inventory for info provided in the question.
                                     It is also better to have simple searches corresponding to a single entity, making this the best action.",
-    "score": 10
+    "score": 7
   }
 
   {
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where
   }
   {"evaluation": "This trajectory is incorrect as my search term should be related to a 4-colors pen with a pencil in it,
                   not a pen and a pencil seperately. A better search term should have been a 4-colors pen with a pencil, all-in-one.",
-    "score": 2
+    "score": 3
   }
 
   Let's begin!:
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where
 
   msgMeta = GeneralUtils.generate_msgMeta(
     a.config[:externalservice][:text2textinstruct][:mqtttopic],
-    senderName= "progressValueEstimator",
+    senderName= "evaluator",
     senderId= a.id,
     receiverName= "text2textinstruct",
     mqttBroker= a.config[:mqttServerInfo][:broker],
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ function progressValueEstimator(a::T1, state::T2)::Tuple{String, Integer} where
       println("")
     end
   end
-  error("progressValueEstimator failed to generate an evaluation")
+  error("evaluator failed to generate an evaluation")
 end
 
 
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ function conversation(a::T, userinput::Dict) where {T<:agent}
           :question=> userinput[:text],
           )  
         )
-      bestplan = runMCTS(a, initialState, decisionMaker, progressValueEstimator, reflector,
+      bestplan = runMCTS(a, initialState, decisionMaker, evaluator, reflector,
                          2, 3, 4, 1.0)
       error("---> bestplan")