update

src/interface.jl

@@ -650,12 +650,11 @@ function evaluator(state::T1, text2textInstructLLM::Function;
   Trajectories: ...
     
   You should then respond to the user with:
-  1) Trajectory_evaluation:
-    - Analyze the trajectories of a solution to answer the user's original question. 
-      Then given a question and a trajectory, evaluate its correctness and provide your reasoning and
-      analysis in detail. Focus on the latest thought, action, and observation. 
-      Incomplete trajectories can be correct if the thoughts and actions so far are correct, 
-      even if the answer is not found yet. Do not generate additional thoughts or actions.
+  1) Trajectory_evaluation: Analyze the trajectory of a solution to answer the user's original question.
+    - Evaluate the correctness of each section and the overall trajectory based on the given question.
+    - Provide detailed reasoning and analysis, focusing on the latest thought, action, and observation.
+    - Incomplete trajectories are acceptable if the thoughts and actions up to that point are correct, even if the final answer isn't reached.
+    - Do not generate additional thoughts or actions.
   2) Answer_evaluation: 
     - Focus only on the matter mentioned in the question and comprehensively analyze how the latest observation's details addresses the question
     - State your rationale
@@ -738,14 +737,14 @@ function evaluator(state::T1, text2textInstructLLM::Function;
         state[:isterminal] = true
 
         # user score as reward because different answers hold different value for the user.
-        state[:reward] = responsedict[:score] 
+        state[:reward] = responsedict[:score]
 
-        #add to vectorDB
+        # add to vectorDB
         if addSQLVectorDB !== nothing
           addSQLVectorDB(state)
         end
       end
-      println("~~~ 5 Evaluator() ", @__FILE__, " ", @__LINE__)
+      println("~~~ Evaluator() ", @__FILE__, " ", @__LINE__)
       pprintln(Dict(responsedict))
 
       return responsedict[:score]